Saturday, 04 February 2012
Energy Labelling Directive
28 November 2009
However, the label’s success has been such that the vast majority of products now fall within the A category, diminishing its meaning and usefulness. In 2009 new labelling requirements for certain product categories were agreed, as was the need for a more general recast of the Directive to bring it up-to-date.
Discussions on the Energy Label became drawn-out and controversial, because of fundamental disagreement over the layout. MEPs, backed by environmental and consumer NGOs, favoured a simple and periodic rescaling of the closed A to G format, as being the clearest, most comprehensible option. However industry and therefore certain Member States opposed this approach as it would mean certain less-performing products suddenly appeared less green.
After several months, in late November 2009 the European Parliament and Council reached a compromise agreement which is now due to be adopted by the Council in December, and the Parliament in January. NGOs are not happy with the agreement, which establishes the possibility of adding three classes above A (A+++). The Commission is supposed to issue a written statement which indicates that re-scaling will take place once a significant proportion of products reaches the two highest classes; but nevertheless, it still means the vast majority of products will remain in a category which includes an "A".




